Page : 1/9

First Page     Prev. Page     Next Page     Last Page

Thursday, 7 Nov 2019 (Only #Current Affairs)

When you find yourself siding with Piers Morgan in an argument or interview, you know the other side is reprehensible.

James Cleverly was tasked with defending the indefensible. He chose to accept the task, despite and after being presented with an argument that suggests, really quite strongly, that uncharitable, deceitful and basically nefarious motives were at the root of the video.

James Cleverly said: "We edited the video to make it shorter."

Actually, they included a segment of a few seconds of silence dubbed over Keir Starmer listening to a question, and thus not talking, which had the effect of making it look like he had no answer after the question was asked. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the intention was here.

To publish the edited video in the first place, presumably expecting no-one to notice or kick off about it shows some hubris. To claim that the motivation was a time constraint suggests a kind of "last chance at the OK Corral" sort of bollocks flapping.

In short:-
1. This stunt was a brazen lie.
2. It's amazing the Conservative Party thought they could get away with it.
3. Boris and his mob may just have clutched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Oh - and after hearing that Boris actually conceded the point to Piers, I expect Cleverly won't be feeling too pleased, or clever, having stuck to the Party line as he did. This lifts "taking one for the team" to a whole new level.

Monday, 13 May 2019 (Only #Current Affairs)

Tucker Carlson interviewed a Dutch historian Rutger Bregman who had just made himself unpopular at Davos. He then went on to make himself unpopular with Carlson, and with Fox who did not air the interview. Fox/Carlson have since had to do some back-peddling after Bregman published the recording he'd made of the interview.

One commentator described Carlson as ""a hollow mouthpiece with no true values". Harsh, but fair?

Sunday, 12 May 2019 (Only #Current Affairs)

Andrew Neil is a consummately professional journalist. Shapiro's lack of preparation for this interview included not boning up on who he would be dealing with.

There's also a fundamental misunderstanding by Shapiro about how journalism in the USA works compared with how it works in the UK. Andrew Neil, in his questions, takes an opposite viewpoint and challenges his subject on a topic. It does not mean he holds the polar opposite views; it's just an adversarial style of questioning, designed to get to the heart of the matter. On American television, it seems you are expected to assume the interviewer holds the position from which their questions come. He even explained his method to Shapiro when the poor Schlep seemed to misunderstand and take offence.

But even considering that stylistic difference in approach, it does not mean you should flounce off when things do not go your way.

Shapiro missed an opportunity here and buried himself. Perhaps he expected a friendly interview and was curve-balled when he found all was not "on side".

Tuesday, 4 Dec 2018 (Only #Current Affairs)

Monday, 21 Aug 2017 (Only #Current Affairs)

It's been a couple of weeks, but the story of the Neo-Nazi related violence at Charlottesville, USA, still seems important to me. Trump has shown his unsuitability for the job of POTUS again. If you needed a recap and some help in clarifying your thoughts on the matter, these outspoken, albeit comedic, commentators might help.

Here is John Oliver delivering a refreshingly concise critique of Donald Trump's response to the event.

Here's Seth Meyers offering his take. Some valid points here. Beacon